Knowledge is being reproduced in a prescribed form coined by the cross-disciplinary approach. That structure is followed and accepted as innovative, and high-indexed journals accept these papers as innovative. This does not reflect innovation; this is because modern research is striving to reunite it (natural and social science). Suppose, when you break H₂O, what do you see? H⁺, O²⁻. The many times you break H₂O through chemical reaction, you get the same result. Hence, where newness stands remains a question. Yes, you can say that through these disciplines' integration, you get new perspectives and ideas. But they are being generated within the juxtaposition of natural and social science. The question is whether scientists or researchers have been able to generate a new one, keeping aside this framework. In nature, before the Big Bang, everything was centered into one point. But, because of the Big Bang, every element dispersed. And researchers and scientists only discover unexpl...